In the news

Find related articles on

Validation of non-invasive detection of Down's syndrome

Analysis of a study published in a science journal   |   By Dr Anna Pokorska-Bocci   |   Published 20 October 2011
Study: DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: An international clinical validation study
By: Palomaki G.E. et al. (12 authors total)
In: Genetics in Medicine
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182368a0e
What this study set out to do:

To clinically validate prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome using measurement of circulating cell-free DNA in maternal plasma, to improve existing diagnostic procedures. 

How they went about it:

A study was designed with a group of almost 5,000 pregnancies with high risk for Down’s syndrome based on maternal age, family history, positive serum analysis and/or sonographic screening.Maternal blood samples were drawn and sent to two independent, CLIA-certified laboratories for testing using the massively parallel shotgun sequencing method (MPSS). The results were compared to fetal karyotyping. 

Outcome:

Once compared to fetal karyotyping the Down syndrome detection rate was 98.6% and the false-positive rate was 0.20%. Testing failed only in 0.8% of pregnancies.  The cases were distributed evenly between the first and second trimester of pregnancy. 

Conclusion:

In high-risk pregnancies, nearly all cases of Down syndrome can be detected from cell-free, maternal plasma DNA with a very low false-positive rate. This study provides evidence of clinical validity of this test and potential to substantially reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and related pregnancy losses. 

Our view:

This study follows and enhances previous attempts to validate the use of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome (see previous news). This is particularly relevant in the current context of sequencing costs falling at a high pace. With this validation study we move even closer to the potential use of this powerful technique in a clinical setting, which could also reduce the amount of necessary invasive diagnostic procedures carrying a non-negligible risk of miscarriage.

Comment on this article