In the news
- About us
- Our work
- In the news
- Monthly news round-up
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- Edition archive
- No. 179, May 2013
- No. 178, April 2013
- No. 177, March 2013
- No. 176, February 2013
- No. 175, January 2013
- No. 174, December 2012
- No. 173, November 2012
- No. 172, October 2012
- No. 171, September 2012
- No. 170, August 2012
- No. 169, July 2012
- No. 168, June 2012
- No. 167, May 2012
- No. 166, April 2012
- No. 165, March 2012
- No. 164, February 2012
- No. 163, January 2012
- No. 162, December 2011
- No. 161, November 2011
- No. 160, October 2011
- No. 159, September 2011
- No. 158, August 2011
- No. 157, July 2011
- No. 156, June 2011
- No. 155, May 2011
- No. 154, April 2011
- No. 153, March 2011
- No. 152, February 2011
- No. 151, January 2011
- No. 150, December 2010
- No. 149, November 2010
- No. 148, October 2010
- No. 147, September 2010
- No. 146, August 2010
- No. 145, July 2010
- No. 144, June 2010
- No. 143, May 2010
- No. 142, April 2010
- No. 141, March 2010
- No. 140, February 2010
- No. 139, January 2010
- No. 138, December 2009
- No. 137, November 2009
- No. 136, October 2009
- No. 135, September 2009
- No. 134, August 2009
- No. 133, July 2009
- No. 132, June 2009
- No. 131, May 2009
- No. 130, April 2009
- No. 129, March 2009
- No. 128, February 2009
- No. 127, January 2009
- No. 126, December 2008
- No. 125, November 2008
- No. 124, October 2008
- No. 123, September 2008
- No. 122, August 2008
- No. 121, July 2008
- No. 120, June 2008
- No. 119, May 2008
- No. 118, April 2008
- No. 117, March 2008
- No. 116, February 2008
- No. 115, January 2008
- No. 114, December 2007
- No. 113, November 2007
- No. 112, October 2007
- No. 111, September 2007
- No. 110, August 2007
- No. 109, July 2007
- No. 108, June 2007
- No. 107, May 2007
- No. 106, April 2007
- No. 105, March 2007
- No. 104, February 2007
- No. 103, January 2007
- No. 102, December 2006
- No. 101, November 2006
- No. 100, October 2006
- No. 99, September 2006
- No. 98, August 2006
- No. 97, July 2006
- No. 96, June 2006
- No. 95, May 2006
- No. 94, April 2006
- No. 93, March 2006
- No. 92, February 2006
- No. 91, January 2006
- No. 90, December 2005
- No. 89, November 2005
- No. 88, October 2005
- No. 87, September 2005
- No. 86, August 2005
- No. 85, July 2005
- No. 84, June 2005
- No. 83, May 2005
- No. 82, April 2005
- No. 81, March 2005
- No. 80, February 2005
- No. 79, January 2005
- No. 78, December 2004
- No. 77, November 2004
- No. 76, October 2004
- No. 75, September 2004
- No. 74, August 2004
- No. 73, July 2004
- No. 72, June 2004
- No. 71, May 2004
- No. 70, April 2004
- No. 69, March 2004
- No. 68, February 2004
- No. 67, January 2004
- No. 66, December 2003
- No. 65, November 2003
- No. 64, October 2003
- No. 63, September 2003
- No. 62, August 2003
- No. 61, July 2003
- No. 60, June 2003
- No. 59, May 2003
- No. 58, April 2003
- No. 57, March 2003
- No. 56, February 2003
- No. 55, January 2003
- No. 54, December 2002
- No. 53, November 2002
- No. 52, October 2002
- No. 51, September 2002
- No. 50, August 2002
- No. 49, July 2002
- No. 48, June 2002
- No. 47, May 2002
- No. 46, April 2002
- No. 45, March 2002
- No. 44, February 2002
- No. 43, January 2002
- No. 42, December 2001
- No. 41, November 2001
- No. 40, October 2001
- No. 39, September 2001
- No. 38, August 2001
- No. 37, July 2001
- No. 36, June 2001
- No. 35, May 2001
- No. 34, April 2001
- No. 33, March 2001
- No. 32, February 2001
- No. 31, January 2001
- No. 30, December 2000
- No. 29, November 2000
- No. 28, October 2000
- No. 27, September 2000
- No. 26, August 2000
- No. 25, July 2000
- No. 24, June 2000
- No. 23, May 2000
- No. 22, April 2000
- No. 21, March 2000
- No. 20, February 2000
- No. 19, January 2000
- No. 18, December 1999
- No. 17, November 1999
- No. 16, October 1999
- No. 15, September 1999
- No. 14, August 1999
- No. 13, July 1999
- No. 12, June 1999
- No. 11, May 1999
- No. 10, April 1999
- No. 9, March 1999
- No. 8, February 1999
- No. 7, January 1999
- No. 6, December 1998
- No. 5, November 1998
- No. 4, October 1998
- No. 3, September 1998
- No. 2, August 1998
- No. 1, July 1998
- Stories by keyword
- Access to Research
- Assisted Reproduction/IVF
- Behavioural Genetics
- Bioethics
- Bioinformatics
- Biomarkers
- Birth defects
- BRCA Genes
- Campaigning Organisations
- Cancer Services
- Cloning
- Consultation
- Direct to consumer tests
- Discrimination
- Disease Susceptibility (Environmental)
- Disease Susceptibility (Genetic)
- DNA Technologies
- Education (Genetics)
- Epigenetics
- Funding
- Gene Therapy
- Genes And Ethnicity
- Genetic Databases
- Genetic Privacy & Consent Issues
- Genetic Tests, Testing & Screening
- Genetics Services
- Government
- Health Economics
- Human Genome Project
- Human Tissue
- Insurance & Employment
- Legal Issues
- Molecular Genetics
- National Health Service (NHS)
- Nutrigenomics
- Opinion
- Other Genome Projects
- Patents & IP
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Pharmacogenetics
- Post-Genomic Projects
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
- Prenatal Testing
- Primary Care
- Public Health
- Public Involvement
- R&D Governance
- Regulatory Framework
- Research Methods/Standards
- Reviews & Commentaries
- Stem Cells
- White Paper
- RSS Feed
- Monthly news round-up
- Resources
- Events
- Contact us
- Support us
- What's new
- Search
In the December 2001 edition
The PHG Foundation monthly newsletter features news and views about genetics and genetics research, from a public health perspective.
The newsletter is written by staff of the PHG Foundation.
In the news
News story |
By Dr Alison Stewart |
Published
4 December 2001
Related resources |
view full story
Websites
- European Science Foundation
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics
- Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP)
News stories
President Bush has issued an Executive Order to create the "President's Council on Bioethics", following the expiry of the charter of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. The role of the Council, which will run for two years, will be to advise the President on issues in bioethics and to explore the "human and moral significance" of new developments in biomedical science and technology. The Council is not expected to reach a consensus view on every issue, but may present a range of views representing the diversity of opinion on the subject. Its 18 members will include, as well as scientists and clinicians, experts from the fields of law, philosophy, social sciences and theology. The first Executive Director of the Council will be Dean Clancy, a policy advisor to the US Congress. Administrative support for the Council will be provided by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Keywords :
Government, Research Methods/Standards
News story |
By Dr Alison Stewart |
Published
18 December 2001
The Department of Health has published the first 23 of a set of 35 definitions of specialised services. The set includes medical genetics as a whole, in addition to separate definitions for two single-gene disorders: cystic fibrosis and haemophilia. The definitions were developed by national working groups coordinated by the London Regional Specialist Commissioning Group, and involved input from commissioners, clinicians, managers, finance and information staff. The Medical Genetic Services definition sets out the core components of a genetic service, which include accurate clinical and genetic laboratory diagnosis, risk estimation, genetic counselling and support for individuals and families, maintenance of confidential family records, and provision of education and training in genetics to other health professionals. Emphasis is placed on the importance of coordination with other services (for example specialised services for women's health, specialised services for children, specialised cancer services, and current and proposed national population screening programmes) in order to ensure good provision in areas such as prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, inherited metabolic disorders and familial cancers. The definition includes detailed descriptions of the activities of clinical and laboratory genetic services, information on national and Europe-wide quality and accreditation standards, and brief discussion of the development of standardised "contracting currencies" for genetic services by the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics. Section B of the report, which sets out views of the working group that are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Health, points out some problems and inadequacies of genetic services as they are currently configured, including the issue of transfer of genetic tests from research to clinical service, the need for national guidance on the commissioning of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and the current lack of clarity in commissioning arrangements for haemoglobin disorders.
Keywords :
Government, Genetics Services
News story |
By Dr Alison Stewart |
Published
4 December 2001
The UK government's emergency legislation to ban human reproductive cloning is expected to receive Royal Assent on 4 December, after being passed by the House of Lords on 26 November and the House of Commons on 29 November. The Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001 prohibits "the placing in a woman of a human embryo which has been created otherwise than by fertilisation". Anyone contravening the law will be liable to a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
News story |
By Dr Alison Stewart |
Published
13 December 2001
Related resources |
view full story
Websites
- Cell-free fetal nucleic acids for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
- What is preimplantation genetic diagnosis?
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
News stories
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has announced that it has decided, in principle, to allow couples who are at risk of having a child with a serious genetic disease to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select an embryo that is both free of the disease and has a tissue type that matches that of an existing affected child. This procedure, which has already been successfully carried out in a private clinic in the US (see article in July newsletter) would only be appropriate in cases where there is a good chance that the disease in the older child could be treated by a transplant of stem cells from the umbilical cord blood of the baby. The HFEA will license applications for the procedure on a case by case basis: approval will only be given if the genetic disease is severe or life-threatening and if all other possible sources of donor tissue for the affected child have been explored. The decision applies only to couples who would already be eligible for PGD to avoid the birth of a child affected by a severe genetic disease; couples with a child affected by leukemia, for example, would not be given approval to use PGD solely for selecting a tissue-matched embryo.
Keywords :
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
